Negative lab pro epson scan4/4/2023 You should then see the profile correctly applied on future conversions. On your previously converted images, you will want to open NLP, go to the convert tab, and hit "unconvert". Make sure you can manually find it as a profile option in Lightroom on a fresh negative. You'll need to download that and add to your camera profiles. So the A9ii profile will be included in the next update.īut I've already made it and you can download it here now if you'd like (hopefully I'm allowed to share a dropbox link?):ĭownload Sony A9ii Profile for Negative Lab Pro -> Negative Lab - Sony ILCE-9M2 v2.dcp The A9ii support for Lightroom came out in LR Classic v9.1, which was right after the latest version of Negative Lab Pro. Whenever I update Negative Lab Pro, I update it to include support for the latest cameras. The online instructions are a bit dated, they say: It runs then off the File, Plug-in Extras menu. Installation is fairly manual but easy - you unzip the file, copy over a bunch of profiles into the LR profile area, and then add the plugin like any other plugin. their "apply") without it charging you for one of the 12. It's actually better than that, as you can experiment but not save the results (i.e. You get a free trial that allows you 12 negative conversions. The product by the way is here: Negative Lab Pro In the next few posts I'll put a bit of my experimentations and experience. So if your goal is to make "normal" adjustments inside LR, you are still limited to tools that invert the tone curve outside and bring a positive back into LR, e.g. So further adjustments are difficult in LR. On the bad side, like all LR tools until Adobe will let us invert the tone curve earlier, it reverses (or just plain screws up) the sliders. That makes it a lot more efficient in terms of disk space and keeps it (sort of) in the lightroom workflow. On the good side (for me) it operates on raw images and adjusts lightroom settings, as opposed to making a pass through TIFF (or whatever) and adjusting outside. Going to do two things in this post, one is give a bit of overview of what I see, but also hope to solicit other input to see if you are finding it worth the cost (about $100 +/-). I tried it some time ago and was not overly impressed, but thought I would try again. While locked in for Covid I'm back to digitizing negatives and gave it another go.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |